
I have a gearing problem on the Vendetta. I am running 160 cranks on 39/53 chain rings coupled to a 12-25 cassette, which has 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 23 and 25. I run a cadence of about 101, which is the same foot speed as running a cadence of 92 on 175 cranks and which is somewhat standard.
At a cadence of 101 and in the 53 ring, the 17t sproket yields 39.5 kph while the 19t yields 35.4. This means if I want to go from the 19t down to the 17t I have to make about (39.4/35.4) squared more force, (24%) or about (39.4/35.4) cubed more power (38%). If the most power I can make has me sitting at 37 or 38 kph then the cadence is either too fast or too slow. I need an intermediary gear.
The lowest gear is a gain ratio of 3.25 which I do need. I don't care for running full tilt down hills, it doesn't help the average speed, so the highest gain ratio of 9.19 is more than enough - its 56.0 kph at 101 cadence.
Better would be compact double on 160s with 34/50 and a 12-23 cassette (which has 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21 and 23), yielding a gain ratio low of 3.08 which would be welcome to a high of 8.67 = 52.8 kph at a 101 cadence. Most importantly it would give very close ratios from 33 kph to 45 kph, right where its needed, spacings of 5.5%, 5.9%, 6.3%, 6.7% and 7.1%. I think I'd more easily find the right gear. Comfort is critical for sustaining higher performance. If there is always a gear available that gives a comfortable cadence, that is the most efficienct for you to sustain your highest level, this is a good thing. Some athletes might be looking to position the spread of ratios a little higher than me, so for them, the jump to a 53t/39 would make perfect sense. For the rest of us the proposed gearing is possibly ideal for a time trial or go-your-hardest bike.
Hmm, by the way, the Dura-Ace range includes an 11-21 cassette!
The presence of something as seemingly inconsequential as an 18t sproket instead of a 17 or 19 turns out to be quite critical.

